Monday evening, October 18th, at the SOMA office of Tech Soup, a group of about 10 women gather for another splendid YWSE event. Louise W. Knight is in town, on a book tour, celebrating the publication of her new book, Jane Addams: Spirit in Action. After getting acquainted over hors d’oeuvres, we took our seats in a circle of couches and stuffed chairs. YWSE chair Liz Zirk introduced us to Louise Knight, and Louise introduced us to Jane Addams.
Jane Addams was one of the nation’s first grassroots organizers and a founder of the fields of social work and sociology. She was the co-founder of Hull House in Chicago, the nation’s first Settlement House, and co-founder of the first national women’s trade union organization. She was a leader in the suffrage movement, international peace and women’s rights movements. In 1931 she was the first American woman to win the Nobel Peace Prize. At her core, she was a humanitarian, connecting people together as humans. She was a consensus builder who brought people together across class lines. She could certainly be called a social entrepreneur of her time.
So would Jane Addams’ leadership style work today? What would she think about the social and political issues of today? Louise Knight helped us to explore these questions and more. Addams’ thinking was responsibility-based, not rights based. She saw rights as absolutes, thus not allowing for compromise. We asked, so is that why we’ve seen such little movement in the abortion debate, with the right of women’s choice being countered with the right to life of the fetus? Even in her argument for women’s suffrage, she advocated that it was women’s responsibility to their families, through voting, to elect the government that would best protect and care for her family.
Addams led with an “intentional light touch;” she listened without judgment. She served as a strong example, but she did not dominate. She believed in the 19th century theory of cooperation where by she asked what she could do with you to help your cause. She was mindful of other people. At Hull House she brought residents together to live and socialize across class lines; to get to know each other on a social basis, beyond that of employer and employee. She ran Hull House as a complete democracy, which gave the residents a lot of freedom. This led to decisions she did not agree with and those that spurred controversy. But she saw this as part of the learning process; the process of democracy being as important as the end results. Addams was a patient woman; she had to be, as her methods were admittedly slow, yet effective. So would Addams’ approach work today? It’s a tough question; what do you think?
Concluding the evening, Louise graciously signed personalized copies of her book for those who purchased it.
